Whether the ‘Dollar Smile’ would help to keep the dollar supported during a US recession is a function of the tightness of the financial and/or economic coupling. While we are of the view that the degree of economic coupling has declined substantially in recent years, financial coupling is likely to have remained high – high enough to preserve the left side of the ‘Dollar Smile’. If we are right, the dollar’s weakness in the first two weeks of the year will be reversed, as investors become more fearful and more risk-averse.
Important Disclosure Information at the end of this Forum
Museum Piece: Japan at Macro Vision
January 21, 2008
By Robert Alan Feldman | Tokyo
Investor attitudes During client visits in the US last week and at the formal session of Macro Vision (Morgan Stanley’s annual conference in New York on the global macroeconomic outlook), the word ‘Japan’ was virtually absent. When discussed at all, Japan was mentioned as a museum piece, i.e., an example from history, relevant to the current world only as a lesson about what happens when there are severe and prolonged policy failures. Indeed, the most common question was whether the US is repeating Japan’s errors that led to the lost decade. The similarities between the US subprime problem and Japan’s financial meltdown are eerie, but there are many differences too. In both cases, there were imprudent borrowers, imprudent lenders and unprepared regulators. Disclosure was inadequate, and financial innovations worsened the problems – since neither markets nor regulators fully understood the implications of the new instruments. The differences are important as well. In the US (and in Europe), institutions have been relatively quick to admit problems and to raise new capital. Broad and deep capital markets, clear standards on capital adequacy and regulator scrutiny have been contributors to this swifter response. Hence, most investors concluded that it will not take the US a decade to correct the subprime/credit problem. For investors in Japanese assets, however, this news only dulls the pain of the impending US economic slowdown on Japanese firms. Thus, the bulk of foreign investors are unlikely to trigger a surge of Japanese equities. This attitude stems not only from adverse macroeconomic developments in Japan (such as consumer sentiment collapse), but also from the atmosphere in the US and the global economy. So long as subprime problems, credit problems, the global slowdown and high energy/agricultural price problems remain, it will be hard to convince investment committees in the US to raise weightings in Japan. In the hallways The hallway chatter about Japan at MacroVision was somewhat different. The many seasoned international investors at the conference are quite aware that Japan can change quickly. Many were among the beneficiaries of the sharp surge of Japanese equity prices in May 2003. They see extremely low valuations for many Japanese companies, even after considering the potential for far worse-than-expected earnings. Indeed, there were several mentions of technical indicators, such as the low P/B ratios and high dividend yields relative to JGB yields (both of which are cited by my colleague Naoki Kamiyama in his bullish arguments). However, while seeing value, US investors are not ready to buy Japan, because they are afraid of a value trap. A catalyst is needed to release the value. With macro policy going back toward old-style pork barrel and with old-guard boardrooms feeling protected by recent court rulings, there is no catalyst in sight. The essence of this attitude was summarized perfectly by a seasoned, Japan-savvy client at the end of the conference: “Call me when something interesting happens.” At least he is willing to take the call. What’s the trade? For investors, Japan is a particularly sticky problem. Neither the direction nor the timing of any turnaround in the economy or corporate performance is clear. One simple response is to avoid Japan altogether. However, this response has an opportunity cost, in case there is a sudden move in markets. For investors worried about that opportunity cost, the response depends on investment style. When investment philosophy allows, options strategies are another possible response. The pessimist’s strategy is a Japanese securities strangle. Even the pessimists acknowledge that low valuations in Japan imply a potential upside. They also acknowledge that Japan can turn on a dime. So, even for pessimists, upside protection is needed. However, if Japan remains on its current path, share prices could fall even more. Thus, one might want to buy both calls and puts, in amounts and with strike prices that suit one’s portfolio and opinions. Such a position would cost money to maintain, but would allow one to sleep at night while concentrating on other markets. The optimist’s strategy is a costless collar. The logic here is that the downside may be limited. After all, even though earnings may fall, valuations are already very low. Moreover, Japan has underperformed other global markets recently. The upside, although uncertain in timing and extent, is large, in light of the huge hidden value on Japanese balance sheets and the potential impact from a return to the reform agenda. Hence, an investor may write puts and use the premiums to buy calls, in amounts and with strike prices that suit one’s portfolio and opinions. Such a position would be costless in terms of money, but not sleep. For long-only investors, another possible response is to prepare buy-lists, and then to start buying when clear signs of an upswing emerge. Depending on the orientation of a portfolio, there are likely to be highly undervalued stocks in Japan that will rise sharply if sentiment turns positive. Even though such a strategy may not be able to call the bottom perfectly, significant increases of value are possible. A final caution comes from recent experience. In September last year, my trip to Europe revealed uniform pessimism. I described this pessimism in Love’s Labor Lost (September 24, 2007). The response was immediate and overwhelming. Investors bought the market in droves, on the view that, when pessimism is so universal, the market must be a buy. Since then, TOPIX has fallen by 14%.
Important Disclosure Information at the end of this Forum

Disclosure Statement
The information and opinions in this report were prepared or are disseminated by Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated and/or Morgan Stanley & Co. International plc and/or Morgan Stanley Japan Securities Co., Ltd. and/or Morgan Stanley Asia Limited and/or Morgan Stanley Asia (Singapore) Pte. (Registration number 199206298Z) and/or Morgan Stanley Asia (Singapore) Securities Pte Ltd (Registration number 200008434H) and/or Morgan Stanley Taiwan Limited and/or Morgan Stanley & Co International plc, Seoul Branch, and/or Morgan Stanley Australia Limited (A.B.N. 67 003 734 576, holder of Australian financial services licence No. 233742, which accepts responsibility for its contents), and/or JM Morgan Stanley Securities Private Limited and their affiliates (collectively, "Morgan Stanley").
Global Research
Conflict Management Policy
This research observes our conflict management policy, available at www.morganstanley.com/institutional/research/management_policies.html
Important Disclosures
This report does not provide individually tailored investment advice. It has been prepared without regard to the circumstances and objectives of those who receive it. Morgan Stanley recommends that investors independently evaluate particular investments and strategies, and encourages them to seek a financial adviser's advice. The appropriateness of an investment or strategy will depend on an investor's circumstances and objectives. This report is not an offer to buy or sell any security or to participate in any trading strategy. The value of and income from your investments may vary because of changes in interest rates or foreign exchange rates, securities prices or market indexes, operational or financial conditions of companies or other factors. Past performance is not necessarily a guide to future performance. Estimates of future performance are based on assumptions that may not be realized.
With the exception of information regarding Morgan Stanley, reports prepared by Morgan Stanley research personnel are based on public information. Morgan Stanley makes every effort to use reliable, comprehensive information, but we do not represent that it is accurate or complete. We have no obligation to tell you when opinions or information in this report change apart from when we intend to discontinue research coverage of a company. Facts and views in this report have not been reviewed by, and may not reflect information known to, professionals in other Morgan Stanley business areas, including investment banking personnel.
To our readers in Taiwan: This publication is distributed by Morgan Stanley & Co. International plc, Taipei Branch; it may not be distributed to or quoted or used by the public media without the express written consent of Morgan Stanley. To our readers in Hong Kong: Information is distributed in Hong Kong by and on behalf of, and is attributable to, Morgan Stanley Asia Limited as part of its regulated activities in Hong Kong; if you have any queries concerning it, contact our Hong Kong sales representatives.
This publication is disseminated in Japan by Morgan Stanley Japan Securities Co., Ltd.; in Canada by Morgan Stanley Canada Limited, which has approved of, and has agreed to take responsibility for, the contents of this publication in Canada; in Germany by Morgan Stanley Bank AG, Frankfurt am Main, regulated by Bundesanstalt fuer Finanzdienstleistungsaufsicht (BaFin); in Spain by Morgan Stanley, S.V., S.A., a Morgan Stanley group company, which is supervised by the Spanish Securities Markets Commission (CNMV) and states that this document has been written and distributed in accordance with the rules of conduct applicable to financial research as established under Spanish regulations; in the United States by Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated, which accepts responsibility for its contents. Morgan Stanley & Co. International plc, authorized and regulated by Financial Services Authority, disseminates in the UK research that it has prepared, and approves solely for the purposes of section 21 of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000, research which has been prepared by any of its affiliates. Private U.K. investors should obtain the advice of their Morgan Stanley & Co. International plc representative about the investments concerned. In Australia, this report, and any access to it, is intended only for "wholesale clients" within the meaning of the Australian Corporations Act.
Trademarks and service marks herein are their owners' property. Third-party data providers make no warranties or representations of the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of their data and shall not have liability for any damages relating to such data. The Global Industry Classification Standard (GICS) was developed by and is the exclusive property of MSCI and S&P. Morgan Stanley bases projections, opinions, forecasts and trading strategies regarding the MSCI Country Index Series solely on public information. MSCI has not reviewed, approved or endorsed these projections, opinions, forecasts and trading strategies. Morgan Stanley has no influence on or control over MSCI's index compilation decisions. This report or portions of it may not be reprinted, sold or redistributed without the written consent of Morgan Stanley. Morgan Stanley research is disseminated and available primarily electronically, and, in some cases, in printed form. Additional information on recommended securities is available on request.

|
|
|